MicroMD PM
126 results found
-
UDS exclusions
There needs to be a way to exclude patients from the UDS reporting. There are several types of patients that should not be included in the UDS report, for instance, test patients, immunization only patients, quick physicals needed for sports/work. These clients are being included in the patients by zip code, Table 3A, 3B, 4, 6A, 6B. There needs to be a place for excluding clients from reporting like there is in the EMR for excluding from meaningful use.
2 votes -
Changes needed for the Anesthesia Concurrence Report
The way the Anesthesia Concurrency Report works at this time is not giving the data the way we expect. Doctors are showing on the report as having a concurrency when they do not have one.
Currently it is designed to look at overlapping times and doesn’t take into account the provider. The system is looking at the start time and as long as there is a different case number with overlapping time that is when it bolds the rows.
We need it to look also at the provider. For example if you have a provider who was not overseeing any…4 votes -
Required Patient Fields - Phone
Setup > Practice Preferences > General Preferences > Required Patient Fields
Update/Change the "Home Phone" requirement of it being the exact field to be any phone number. Basically we just need a single phone number regardless of whether it is a Home/Work/Cell/Alternate. As long as 1 phone number exist (which is typically not a HOME anymore) then the requirement would be satisfied.
Majority of cases, the staff are adding the cell as the home and duplicating it again in the cell field.
11 votesThank you for your feedback on the MicroMD product! We are pleased to inform you that this item has been approved and is in active development! In addition to each unique phone type (cell, home, alternate) as an option field to make required, we are also adding email for those who are using MMDengage to provide a more comprehensive collection of patient demographics.
Onwards and upwards!
Product Management
-
Limit or Block Access to Adjustments still allowing person to post payments
I would like control over who can post adjustments to an account while still allowing the person to post payments from patients. As the program is now I can block both but not one or the other.
2 votes -
Showing Last Sequence Note in Open Claims Report
It would be beneficial to include an option to see the last sequence note in the open claims report. It could streamline the aging follow up process and avoid having to click into each account/sequence note to determine next steps with the account.
2 votes -
Print full middle name in Print Patient Info and all reports
Since the newer versions of MicroMD allow the user to add the full middle name to the demographics, it would be nice to have the middle name print in print patient information and all reports.
3 votes -
to add a physician in demographics
There currently is on patient details and demographics a field for referring physician and pcp. We are an ophthalmologist and have many diabetic patients that have an endocrinologist along with a pcp. Consultation letters are done to the pcp but also need to send one to the endocrinologist. If there were a field for that, we could enter that physician and be able to have a generated letter to both the pcp and the endocrinologist. Or listed as another physician type? We currently have to put a note in remarks or a note somewhere in micromd to do that extra…
3 votes -
print future appointments in PM
We currently use appointment cards to give patients when they check out. We would like to be able to print the future appointments from the PM instead of hand writing them.
7 votes -
Sequence Note
It would be great if we could put a check mark on more than one sequence in charges/payments and choose sequence note and have the note go onto ALL checked off sequences. Rather than copy/paste or use general note.
2 votes -
Minors
It would be nice to have the ability to identify via a report of patients who are a minor with no responsibly party listed on the account. On the opposite side another report to show patients who are now an adult who have a responsibly party listed.
6 votes -
change the way we handle Min Balance and Min Amt Due in statement window
Client would like the statement window to only look at patient related balances and not the overall patient account. So the Min Balance to only look at Patient responsible and not both patient and insurance overall balance. And they would like the Min Amt Due to only look at individual patient sequence and not the entire patient due amount of account.
4 votes -
Manual posting of Medicare sequestration
Request: Allow the Medicare sequestration amount to go to the line level adjustments when payments are manually posted. If not caught, the secondary claim is invalid in the clearinghouse and causes CAS segment errors.
Impact on Workflow: clean claims, reduction in time spent fixing claims allowing staff to attend to other issues.
7 votes -
Plan ID Search should not be wild card search
The only way to search for plans in "plan id" space under the plan sets tab is by ID#, not name. If you type in FFS, looking for Medicare FFS, it says none found because there is no % defaulted to the beginning of the search. YOu should just be able to search like in the large database of plan list - no wildcard required. Most users do not know about wildcards and so when they can't find plan, it is frustrating.
9 votes -
Additional Options to Flag Potential Duplicate Accounts Other Than SSN#
Need an additional option in flagging duplicate accounts other than the SSN#-perhaps by duplicate F/L Name and/or DOB
15 votesThank you for your feedback on the MicroMD product! We are pleased to inform you that this item has been approved for consideration and are looking forward to building this feature! If we have questions as things progress, we will reach out.
Onwards and upwards!
Product Management
-
Rights to lock specific fields.
In the attached screenshot the permissions for patient is expanded. In the detail subfolder there would be another subfolder called lock. Within that lock folder any drop down and/or check box field could be selected to lock. For instance if the category drop down field was selected as locked that user or group would not have permission to make any changes to that field. By default the lock would be blank and all users would be able to make changes.
5 votesMicroMD will be making changes in future whiile combining users and roles. We will consider this suggestion while we plan those changes.
-
Locking Search Arguments
Description of Request: Have an option to lock the search arguments in the PM to the 'Created search arguments'
Requested Steps to define spec: Have a checkbox to lock the search arguments box so users cannot free type text in there. This will help with reporting and accuracy.
Expected Result: Consistency with the data
Actual Result: Free typed data that is harder to match up.
Impact on Workflow: Takes extra time to ensure data is accurate.4 votes -
Add an option to have a pop up at arrival if eligibility was not checked or eligibility eturned as N or ?
Add an option to have an automatic pop up at registration that will alert the front desk clerk that a patient's eligibility has not been checked or the eligibility check failed - making it more obvious to the user that corrective action is necessary.
Also - prompt to automatically verify eligibility when adding a new insurance ID to help remind at point of entry on day of service.
12 votesReview stage id 29269
-
Improve reporting options for patient wait times/time from arrival to clinical - across Pm and EMR
Add reporting options to track time from arrival to time routed by clinical team to a room - and from time of arrival to time doctor started encounter or discharged patient. Currently you can view Pm time tracking and EMR time tracking separately but not as it related to both areas - so we lack the visibility to how long patient waited for clinical team or doctor.
1 voteDuplicate suggestion ref id 10797
-
Ability to track who enters, deletes or edits recalls
We enter 300-400 recalls a month. Sometimes there are mistakes and we cannot track the user to provide additional training. It would be VERY helpful if under "Patient Log" in the "Patient Detail" screen it would tell you who entered, inactivated, deleted a recall, etc. by listing it as it does now when demographics are updated. If not there, then maybe a 'user' column in the recall area itself to help identify who is making mistakes. We bring patients back for cancerous polyps, so it's extremely important to get these entered correctly. Thank you!
6 votes -
EB Summary Report for Dental claims
When running the EB Summary report for dental claims, the DX Code warning is listed for every patient because dental does not apply DX codes. If it is a dental form, the system should omit the DX Code rule. Also, you cannot see on the EB Summary report if a Tooth Number, Surface, or Arch was added. You have to open each claim to ensure the required information is attached.
8 votesThank you for the suggestion and votes. The item now will be reviewed by our feature team. ID 30800
- Don't see your idea?