Adam White
My feedback
9 results found
-
3 votesAdam White
shared this idea
·
-
2 votesAdam White
shared this idea
·
-
9 votesAdam White
shared this idea
·
-
6 votesAdam White
supported this idea
·
-
6 votes
After some research found these are valid billable codes in situation when used properly on claims. Having this kind of option may cause further issue when the code needs to go out on a claim. I would suggest they add cross code messages to their codes so a biller will get a prompt that they may want to remove the code or at least the pointer from the claim if it doesn’t fit the claim situation. Or setup a rule in the Rules Manager so when Batching EB claims it flags the claims with the Z code dx. Coder believes the best maybe the cross code msg and the biller make the decision to remove the pointer or code or not remove since it maybe necessary on a claim.
Adam White
supported this idea
·
-
6 votesAdam White
supported this idea
·
-
11 votesAdam White
supported this idea
·
-
11 votesAdam White
shared this idea
·
-
7 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Adam White
supported this idea
·
If PM would add the "merge patients" feature for PM then this is less needed. However, it's still a useful tool and makes sense to me. I want it. One vote for you.